Legal Opinion
Maggio v. Robinson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 1999No. 31,913-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
741 So.2d 103 (1999)
Venson MAGGIO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Huey ROBINSON, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 31,913-CA
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
May 5, 1999.
Loyd Kenneth Thomas, Counsel for Defendants-Appellants.
Thomas A. Wilson, Jr., Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Before NORRIS, C.J., CARAWAY and KOSTELKA, JJ.
NORRIS, Chief Judge.
The defendants, Huey Robinson and Ruthie Robinson[1] ("Robinson"), appeal a judgment that found them in contempt of court, assessed damages and attorney fees, and denied various exceptions. For the reasons expressed, we amend to delete the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- STATE, DOTD v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Rivet v. State, Dept. of Trans. and Dev.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Steed v. ST. PAUL'S UNITED METH. CHURCHLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Co-Op., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Reeves v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Custom-Bilt Cabinet v. Quality Built Cab.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Joseph v. ENTERGYLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Barlow v. BarlowLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Shreveport Neon Signs, Inc. v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Brooks v. MaggioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.