In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Jacqueline Schofield
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:
This case raises questions concerning the district court’s application of our holding in In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 486 F.2d 85 (3d Cir., 1973) (Schofield I). Because we conclude that the requirements of Schofield I have been met, the district court order is affirmed.1
I
In Schofield I this court soundly rejected any contention that the district court should “rubber stamp” petitions for the enforcement of grand jury subpoenas. Instead we held that the trial court would first be required to satisfy itself of the propriety of the subpoena.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- In re Marriage of BettsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Sovereign News Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Thomas A. LiberatoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Moskow, SigmundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.