Legal Opinion

State v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1938No. 26847. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This action was begun in January, 1936, against the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, by filing a complaint alleging, in substance, that the Sunset Pacific Oil Company, on June 4, 1935, procured a fuel and Diesel oil distributor’s license under the provisions of Title XI, chapter 180, Laws of 1935, p. 749, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 8370-78 [P. C. §7030-138] et seq., and filed a bond with the defendant as surety, conditioned, as required by the act, to pay plaintiff any taxes which might become due from it as such distributor, and that the oil company, on September 9th, “imported into…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Waring v. MayorSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Mayor of Mobile v. WaringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  4. King v. McEvoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1862

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Union Oil Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Oregon Liquor Control Commission v. CoeOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API