Madison Limestone Company v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a decree overruling demurrers to a bill in equity and to various aspects of the bill.
The décree overrules the demurrer to’ the amended bill as a whole, asserting that there are’ no grounds of demurrer addressed to the bill as- a whole. It then separately overrules the demurrer addressed to certain named aspects of it. There is only one assignment of error, — that of overruling “the respondents’ demurrer to the complainants’ original bill of complaint as amended.” With respect to such an assignment, we observed in Hays v. McCarty, 239 Ala. 400, 195 So. 241, 244, that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hays v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- McHan v. McMurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Allison-Russell-Withington Co. v. SommersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Madison Limestone Company v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Taylor v. BailesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- PAK-A-SAK OF ALABAMA, INC. v. LautenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- State Department of Public Safety v. Scotch Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Radue v. McCulloughCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Schultz v. BarbourSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972