Legal Opinion

Viland v. Winslow

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1971No. Docket 10162PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

Plaintiff, Les Viland, brought this suit against defendant, Max Winslow, a periodontist, alleging malpractice. After the close of all proofs, the trial judge granted defendant’s motion for directed verdict and dismissed the jury. Plaintiff appeals as of right.

When a motion for directed verdict is made at the close of all proofs, the trial judge, having heard all the evidence to be presented in the case, applies the same test for determining the sufficiency of evidence as in motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. See GCR 1963, 515.2; Yacobian v. Vartanian (1922), 221 Mich 25; Hes v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schedlbauer v. Chris-Craft Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Roberts v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Zoterell v. ReppMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Skeffington v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Yacobian v. VartanianMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tomei v. Bloom Associates, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Isom v. FarrugiaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Abdolreza Bagherzadeh v. Waldomar M. Roeser, M.D., and Orthopedic Surgery Association, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Cleveland v. RizzoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Berwald v. KasalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API