Legal Opinion

Langadinos v. Washington State Bar Association

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 26, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00250Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 GREGORY LANGADINOS, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-250 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 AMEND v. 10 WASHINGTON STATE BAR 11 ASSOCIATION, WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION BOARD 12 OF GOVERNORS, LISA AMATANGEL, Associate Director; 13 Litigation and Internal Operations, JULIE SHANKLAND, Coordinator; 14 ADA/504 WSBA, WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT, 15 Defendants. 16 17 1. INTRODUCTION 18 Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff Gregory Langadinos moves for leave to file an 19 amended complaint. Dkt. No. 47. Because his proposed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API