Hess v. Mumma
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
This appeal from the refusal of the court to enter judgment for the defendants n.o.v. raises the single question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence as ia matter of law.
Fruitville Pike and Keller Avenue intersect at right angles near the City of Lancaster. They are both public highways, each improved with a macadam pavement sixteen feet wide. Neither is a “through highway.” On March 19,1937 the minor plaintiff, then about 19 years of age, was driving his automobile southwardly on Fruitville Pike. It was daylight with good visibility. Plaintiff testified that he…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simon v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Lewis v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Polonofsky v. DobroskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Wescott v. GeigerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Mehler v. DoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peters v. ShearSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Von Cannon v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Fisher v. ReillyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Knies v. KraftsowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Williams v. Philadelphia Toilet & Laundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.