Legal Opinion

Cain v. Cain

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1977No. 10040PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In the trial court, Camille Ann Cain, appellant here, sought to collect, by execution and garnishment in aid thereof, delinquent amounts of child support and maintenance owed by her former husband John William Cain, respondent here. John filed a motion to quash the execution and the trial court sustained the motion and entered its order quashing the execution and the garnishment issued in aid thereof. Camille appeals from that order. The appeal lies. Hardin v. Hardin, 512 S.W.2d 851, 852[1] (Mo.App.1974).

The judgment must be reversed on the basis of principles enunciated in Bonadonna v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hardin v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Hedgecorth v. HedgecorthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Bonadonna v. BonadonnaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cain v. Buehner and BuehnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Karleskint v. KarleskintMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Cain v. WebsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Cain v. State Board of PodiatryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API