Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 4, 1925No. 11,212PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Allen

At the general election in November, 1924, the plaintiff in error was a candidate for the office of county commis sioner of Kiowa county, and defendant in error was a rival candidate for the same office. On the face of the returns, defendant in error was elected by a majority of five votes.

Plaintiff in error instituted an election contest. A summons was duly issued, and service thereof had, or attempted to be made, under that clause of section 40 of the Code of 1921 providing that a summons may be served by leaving a copy thereof at the usual place of abode of defendant with some member of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Union Pac. R'y Co. v. De BuskSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  2. Martin v. SimpkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Colorado Cent. R. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  4. Orinoco Co. v. Orinoco Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
  5. Campbell Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burnett v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API