Legal Opinion
Spitulski v. Bd. of Educ. of the Toledo City Sch. Dist.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 2017No. L-16-1225PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJensen, P.J.
{¶ 1} In this accelerated appeal, defendants-appellants, James Gault and Heather Baker, appeal the October 4, 2016 judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, which rejected their assertion of immunity under R.C. 2744.01 et seq. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court's judgment, in part, and reverse, in part.
I. Background
{¶ 2} Sixty-seven-year-old Ronald Spitulski was employed by the Board of Education ("the Board") of the Toledo City School District ("the District") for nearly 25 years, most recently as a supervisor of the pupil personnel center. He was responsible…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spitulski v. Bd. of Educ. of the Toledo City Sch. Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Holmes v. Cuyahoga Community CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Parmertor v. Chardon Local SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Evans v. Shawnee Twp. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Evans v. Shawnee Twp. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.