Legal Opinion

Holibaugh v. Ito

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1937No. Civ. 11357Published

1Opinion of the Court

21 Cal.App.2d 480 (1937)

JAMES J. HOLIBAUGH, Appellant,

v.

KISHERO ITO et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 11357.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.

June 23, 1937.

Garnet C. Rainey and Edward D. Neuhoff for Appellant Holibaugh.

Merriam, Rinehart & Merriam for Appellant Mathews.

Joseph A. Spray and Charles P. Gould for Respondents.

McComb, J.

The above-entitled actions to recover damages for personal injuries were consolidated for trial and plaintiffs appeal from judgments in favor of defendants after trial by jury. The questions raised by both appeals will be disposed of in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. GosdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Berlin v. ViolettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Prato v. SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API