Legal Opinion

Bratton v. Hoerr

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

This action is brought to recover for work and labor done by the plaintiff as a farm laborer for the defendant between the fifth clay of October, 1915 and the tenth day of October, 1919. The defendant denies any employment of the plaintiff, and further denies that he is indebted to the plaintiff on any account whatsoever.

It appears that the defendant owned certain farm lands near McKenzie, Burleigh county, North Dakota. One Coffin was farming 'these lands under a lease. In October, 1915, Coffin hired the plaintiff as a farm laborer. Coffin died in 1917. His widow continued in occupation of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lake Grocery Co. v. ChiostriNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Eviston v. CramerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. RootNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Gordon v. Vermont Loan & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. JR Watkins Company v. VangenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rigler v. North Dakota Construction Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Parker Motor Co. v. Northern Packing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Brooks v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State Bank v. Northland Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API