Legal Opinion

Vercimak v. Ostoich

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1950No. 7295Published

1Opinion of the Court

118 Utah 253 (1950)

221 P.2d 602

VERCIMAK

v.

OSTOICH.

No. 7295.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Decided August 21, 1950.

Gustin & Richards, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Wendell C. Day, Murray, for respondent.

LATIMER, Justice.

Plaintiff commenced this action in the court below for a partnership accounting. He alleged that the partnership was terminated by the wrongful acts of defendant and that only a partial accounting was had. The trial court found that the defendant had terminated the relationship and had benefited by taking over a going business and awarded plaintiff judgment for one-half the value of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Von Bremen v. . MacMonniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Williams v. FarrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hutchinson v. NayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Hutchins v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API