Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Duncan

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided July 15, 1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order made on a motion by defendants, to . substitute an adverse claimant of the fund in suit as defendant. The decision of the motion is reported 8 Ante, 354.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.—Robertson, J.

This action is brought, as appears by the complaint therein, to recover a balance of $53,000 deposited with the defendants as a loan, on the 30th day of June, 1858, by the firm of L. O. Wilson & Co., and assigned on that day by Wilson & Co. to the present plaintiffs, of which notice was given to the defendants on the 1st day of July, 1858.

On the 3d day of July, 1858, the defendants received a notice from the members of the firm of J. W. Paige & Co., stating the commencement of an action by them in the Supreme Court of this State against the members of the firm of L.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. CosterNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
  2. Kuhlman v. OrserThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
  3. St. John v. CroelNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Sherman v. PartridgeThe Superior Court of New York City · 1855
  5. Orser v. GrossmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1855

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lynch v. St. JohnNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1878
  2. Bruggemann v. Bank of the MetropolisNew York Marine Court · 1877
  3. O'Brien v. Mechanics'The Superior Court of New York City · 1873
  4. Sulzbacher v. National Shoe & Leather BankThe Superior Court of New York City · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API