Legal Opinion

United States v. David Bernard Abeyta

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1994No. 93-2192PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, Associate Justice (Retired).

Appellant challenges his assault conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 113(c), arguing primarily that the trial court’s stated reasons for denying him a lesser included offense instruction were improper. We think his claim meritorious and remand the case to the District Court for further proceedings.

In the afternoon of April 2,1992, appellant David Abeyta consumed a six pack of beer and a pair of whiskey shots before making his way to the home of Jody Sandoval, a friend. He went to Sandoval’s seeking a ride to the Hacienda Lounge in Española, New Mexico where he…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. ChanthadaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Richard Ray LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Ramon SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Michael Gabriel Duran, United States of America v. Leo Herman Monroe, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API