Legal Opinion
Rutgard v. Haynes
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 21, 1999No. Civ. 98-0524-TW(JFS)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT [35-1]
STIVEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
Defendant’s Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement in the above-referenced case was heard before Magistrate Judge Stiven in Courtroom E on April 15, 1999. Attorneys Mike Leone and Reg Vi-tek appeared on behalf of Defendant. Attorney William Cohan appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Having read the written submissions of the parties, heard argument of counsel, and being fully advised, the Court FINDS and ORDERS as follows:
II
BACKGROUND
In May 1992, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Yanez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. David L. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Torres v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Ralph S. Slottow Fidelity Federal Bank, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant. Ralph S. Slottow, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, and Fidelity Federal Bank, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.