Legal Opinion

Roug v. Ohio Security Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1986No. B017288PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (Thaxton), J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Ralph Roug (Plaintiff and/or Roug), who filed a “Complaint for Declaratory Relief” seeking uninsured motorist coverage from defendant Ohio Security Insurance Company (Ohio), appeals from a judgment by the trial court (Hon. Richard A. Lavine, judge presiding) in favor of defendant Ohio. We affirm.

Facts

The following facts are undisputed: On July 8, 1982, plaintiff Roug purchased an automobile insurance policy (No. DBS 072 2900) from de fendant Ohio covering his 1968 Chevrolet Impala automobile. The policy issued included the basic policy and an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Campbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Watamura v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Daun v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Daun v. USAA Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Franklin EWC, Inc. v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API