Legal Opinion
Eustice v. Grandy's
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided February 11, 1992No. 05-91-00783-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAPLAN, Justice.
Scott Eustice appeals from an order dismissing his lawsuit against Grandy’s and Jamila Thomas for want of prosecution. In two points of error, Eustice contends that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to reinstate the case. Grandy’s asserts a cross-point for delay damages under rule 84 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We overrule Eustice’s points of error and Grandy’s cross-point and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
BACKGROUND FACTS
Scott Eustice sued Grandy’s and Thomas for personal injuries sustained in two unrelated accidents. The case was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bevil v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Ozuna v. Southwest Bio-Clinical Laboratories, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
- Melton v. Ryander, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Moore v. Armour & Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988
- Loyd Elec. Co., Inc. v. Millett, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Maida v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Burton v. Hoffman, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Cappetta v. Hermes, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- Olin Corp. v. Coastal Water Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Elm Creek Villas Homeowner Ass'n v. Beldon Roofing & Remodeling Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.