Legal Opinion

State v. Osman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 24, 1990No. 6745PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

On trial to a jury, the defendant was convicted of the crimes of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3), and of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in vio*301lation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-134 (a) (3). He appeals from the trial court’s refusal to set aside the jury verdict and render judgment of acquittal on both counts. His appeal is based on two alternative claims: That the evidence was insufficient to identify him as a participant in the robbery; and that the pellet gun used in the robbery was not a dangerous instrument as…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. BrunoriConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. State v. OsmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. State v. BattistaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. State v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API