Legal Opinion

Petersen v. City of Mesa

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2004No. CV-03-0100-PRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This case requires us to determine the constitutionality of a city’s random, suspicion-less drug testing of its firefighters. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to Article VI, Section 5.3 of the Arizona Constitution, Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 12-120.24, and Rule 23 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.

I

¶ 2 Craig Petersen works as a firefighter for the City of Mesa. In 2001, after Petersen was hired, the City implemented a substance abuse program (the Program) for the Mesa Fire Department. The Program requires testing of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Citizen Publishing Co. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. In Re Leopoldo L.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. State v. OkkenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. State v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API