Maddox v. Attorney General Office
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LEO R. MADDOX, : Plaintiff, v. - Civ. No. 19-914-RGA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, et al., ; Defendants. Leo R. Maddox, Lyndhurst, Virginia. Pro Se Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION November , 2019 Wilmington, Delaware ¢ ANDREWS, U.S. District Judge: Plaintiff Leo R. Maddox, who appears pro se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, commenced this action on May 16, 2019, raising claims under
42 U.S.C. § 1983
and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”),
18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68. (D.I.1). The Court reviews…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.