Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Attorney General Office

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 4, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00914Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LEO R. MADDOX, : Plaintiff, v. - Civ. No. 19-914-RGA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, et al., ; Defendants. Leo R. Maddox, Lyndhurst, Virginia. Pro Se Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION November , 2019 Wilmington, Delaware ¢ ANDREWS, U.S. District Judge: Plaintiff Leo R. Maddox, who appears pro se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, commenced this action on May 16, 2019, raising claims under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”),

18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68. (D.I.1). The Court reviews…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API