Legal Opinion

Stoehrer & Pratt Dodgem Corp. v. Greenberg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 10, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The defendant on March 28,1921, purchased of the plaintiff an amusement device known as the “ Dodgem,” consisting of fifteen cars, and on May 16, 1921, she bought three additional cars and gave in payment her promissory note. The case was tried on the second count of the declaration, which is for the balance with interest of the contract price due on the first purchase, and on the third count to recover the amount of the note with interest according to its tenor. The defendant, relying on the averments of her answer, made an offer of proof, that prior to the purchase of any of the cars the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. KirvenSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Bates v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Boston Consolidated Gas Co. v. FolsomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Churchill v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snelling v. DineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Whitty Manufacturing Co. v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Valley Refrigeration Co. v. Lange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. The E 270District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
  5. Wisdom v. Morris Hardware Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API