Legal Opinion
The E 270
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 12, 1927No. 3279PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge.
This is a libel to recover a balance due for a new engine. The boat has been sold and the net proceeds are now in the registry. The questions are (1) whether the boat is liable for the engine; and (2) how much, if anything, is due.
As to the first: For reasons which I stated orally at the conclusion of the argument, I think it clear that Mrs. Bowdring, the owner of the boat, knew of and assented to the contract for the installation of this engine, understanding that the boat was to be liable therefor. The fact that the seller of the engine reserved title ■ does not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hooven, Owens & Rentschler, Co. v. John Featherstone's SonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Boston Consolidated Gas Co. v. FolsomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Linen Thread Co. v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
- The St. S. Angelo TosoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Turkish State Railways Administration v. Vulcan Iron WorksDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- The Henry S.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1933
- Reed & Rice Co. v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1933
- In re Southern Transp. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1935
- The President ArthurCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928