Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hampton v. Black

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 20, 1991No. CA 90-104Published

1DissentJohn E. Jennings, Judge

While I have no quarrel with the treatment of the substantive issues presented, I cannot agree that the order is appealable. The idea that an order ending a “severable branch” of the litigation is appealable began as dicta in Davie v. Davie, 52 Ark. 224, 12 S.W. 558 (1889). In Parker v. Murray, 221 Ark. 554, 254 S.W.2d 468 (1953), the supreme court held that an order was appealable “where a distinct and several branch of the case is finally determined, although the suit is not ended.” (Quoting Davie v. Davie, supra.) While I do not disagree with the concept, I do not think that it will be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davie v. DavieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  2. H. E. McConnell & Son v. SadleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Gina Marie Farms v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Allred v. National Old Line Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. State v. Greenville Stone & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API