Kraft v. Burr
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
SENIOR JUSTICE WHITING
delivered the opinion of the Court.
*275In this appeal, the primary issues are whether letters of patent from two English monarchs, acting through their royal governors, could and did grant exclusive fishing rights in a navigable river, and, if so, whether the complainants are the successors in title to the patentees and can assert those rights to prohibit the public from fishing in the part of the river running over their land.
Ethridge E. Burr and a number of other persons (the property owners) claim to own the stream beds under parts of the Jackson River in Alleghany County…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Crenshaw v. Slate River Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1828
- Bradford v. Nature ConservancySupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- Avocet Development Corp. v. McLean BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Loving v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bay House Associates, L.P. v. JenkinsNorthumberland County Circuit Court · 2002
- Crump v. ForbesWarren County Circuit Court · 2000
- Kraft v. BurrSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- VMRC v. Chincoteague InnSupreme Court of Virginia · 2014