Legal Opinion

Busch v. Eisin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 26, 1981No. 80-1221PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGLOON

Brokers instituted an action against sellers to recover a real estate commission. In their complaint, brokers alleged that they were entitled to such commission under the terms of a listing agreement. The trial court dismissed brokers’ complaint, finding that since their right to a commission was expressly conditioned upon the sale of sellers’ property, and since the sale was not consummated until after the expiration of the listing period, brokers were not entitled to a commission.

On appeal, brokers argue that the trial court erred in determining that the property was “sold” upon closing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tatar v. Maxon Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Pierce v. MacNeal Memorial Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Van C. Argiris Co. v. Caine Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. J. J. Harrington & Co. v. TimmermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Arthur Rubloff & Co. v. Comco Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ranch World of New Mexico, Inc. v. Berry Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bennett & Kahnweiler Associates v. RatnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Bennett & Kahnweiler, Inc. v. American National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Carolantic Realty, Inc. v. Matco Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Re/Max R.E. Professionals, Inc. v. ArmstrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API