Legal Opinion

May Department Stores Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1987No. B009324PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

—Defendants and appellants County of Los Angeles (County or Assessor), its tax collector, H. B. Alvord, and certain cities on behalf of which the County collects taxes, appeal those portions of a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and appellant the May Department Stores Company (the May Company).

The May Company cross-appeals as to the portion of the judgment favorable to the County.

Because the trial court: (1) incorrectly ruled the Assessor had taxed the carpeting in the May Company’s stores as both structure and personal property; (2) improperly required the Assessor…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. BRET HARTE INN, INC v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. ITT World Communications, Inc v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Xerox Corp. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of Orange v. Orange County Assessment Appeals Board No. 1California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. 40235 Washington St. Corp. v. WC LUSARDIDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2001
  3. Transworld Systems, Inc. v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Amdahl Corp. v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API