Legal Opinion

Hosken v. Rowlands

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jerome C. Gorski, J.

This matter comes before this court by way of defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing all of the claims against the defendants herein. Plaintiff opposes this motion and in turn, makes a cross motion for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

*77Plaintiff alleges that on September 23, 1986, at 8:00 p.m., as plaintiff proceeded westbound on Route 5 in the Town of Hamburg, that defendants’ dog entered the roadway. Plaintiff swerved to avoid hitting the dog and sideswiped a vehicle to her left also traveling westbound. Plaintiff attempted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Young v. WymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nilsen v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API