Legal Opinion
Young v. Wyman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 27, 1990PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division (159 AD2d 792) as held that the mere presence of an unrestrained dog on the street does not give rise to a presumption of negligence on the part of its owner.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Judge Kaye dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion in which Judge Simons concurs.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Young v. WymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by22 opinions
- Althoff v. LefebvreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Staller v. WestfallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Nilsen v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Akley v. ClemonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Sinon v. AnastasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.