Legal Opinion

Citizens Industrial Bank of Austin v. Oppenheim

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1936No. 8175PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, chief justice.

The bank sued Oppenheim and wife upon three promissory notes and to foreclose chattel mortgages upon jewelry severally pledged to secure the notes. In addition to other pleas, not involved in the appeal, Oppenheim set up a cross-action predicated upon a conversion of the jewelry pledged to secure the third note; consisting of a lady’s diamond ring, and a lady’s diamond-studded brooch pin. In a trial upon special issues, judgment was in favor of the bank upon the first two notes with foreclosure of the mortgage upon the specific property securing each note; and in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. LancasterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Malone v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Citizens Industrial Bank of Austin v. OppenheimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API