Legal Opinion
Muci v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 2005No. Docket 251438PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
In this action under the Michigan no-fault automobile insurance act, MCL 500.3101 et seq., plaintiffs no-fault insurer, defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, appeals by leave granted the order granting defendant’s motion for a medical examination of plaintiff, subject to several conditions, pursuant to MCR 2.311.1 We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident on May 15, 2002. Defendant initially paid personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to plaintiff, but subsequently refused to pay benefits. Plaintiff filed the present action…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Putkamer v. Transamerica Insurance Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coates v. Bastian Brothers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Muci v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Ewin v. BurnhamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Coates v. Bastian Brothers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Muci v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.