Legal Opinion

Murchie v. Peck Bros. & Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;.—heard in that court ón appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. George F. Blanke, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

This is assumpsit to recover on a promissory note, as follows:

“$1900.

Chicago, March 28, 1893.

“Ninety days after date I promise to pay to the order of Peter Gow the principal sum of $1900 at 1208 Tacoma Building, with interest at seven per cent per annum after maturity-

George L. Murchie,

Janet H. Murchie.”

Indorsed, “Pay to the order of Peck Bros. & Co.— Peter Gow.”

The declaration contained a special count, in part as follows: “For that whereas the said defendants, heretofore, to-wit, on the 28th day of March, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-three, at Chicago,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richelieu Hotel Co. v. International Military Encampment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Harlow v. BoswellIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  3. St. Clair County Benevolent Society v. FietsamIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Linnberg v. City of Rock IslandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  2. Citizens Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Paradis & Sons, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  3. Graff v. FoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
  4. Berghoff v. CummingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  5. West Chicago St. R. R. v. LupsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API