Legal Opinion

Rice v. Bamberg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 7, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Dantzeer, J., Bamberg, September, 1904. Action by Eugenia M. Rice against F. M. Bamberg. From Circuit decree, defendant appeals. cites: On question of subrogation: 18 S. C., 123; 41 S. C., 337; 58 S. C., 382; 67 S. C., 454; 40 S. C., 417; 1 Strob. Eq., 51; 62 S. C., 304; 24 Fncy., 1 ed., 258, 261, 266, 267; 2 Am. St. R., 328; 29 Am. St. R., 800 ; 30 Am.

Read the full summary

Before Dantzeer, J., Bamberg, September, 1904. Action by Eugenia M. Rice against F. M. Bamberg. From Circuit decree, defendant appeals. cites: On question of subrogation: 18 S. C., 123; 41 S. C., 337; 58 S. C., 382; 67 S. C., 454; 40 S. C., 417; 1 Strob. Eq., 51; 62 S. C., 304; 24 Fncy., 1 ed., 258, 261, 266, 267; 2 Am. St. R., 328; 29 Am. St. R., 800 ; 30 Am. Dec., 174; Sheldon on Sub., sec. 209. Oíñcers are presumed to hwe done their duty: 22 Fncy., 2 ed., 1267, et seq.; 1 Hill Eq., 369; 5 Rich. L., 534; 14 S. C., 454; 24 S. C., 503. cite: When doctrine of subrogation may be applied: 70' S.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

In this action for the recovery of real estate the plaintiff claimed as devisee in remainder under the will of John M. Whetstone. The defendant set up title under a sale made by order of the Court in an action instituted by the executrix of the will of Whetstone to marshal the assets of the estate, and sell the real estate in aid of personalty for the payment of debts. By reference to former appeals in the cause, reported in 59 S. C., 498, 38 S. E., 309, and 68 S. C., 184, 46 S. E., 1009, it will be seen the title of defendant failed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rice v. BambergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kirton v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API