Legal Opinion

Langenberger v. Dahl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1983No. 82-598PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

This case is an appeal from an order of the Hennepin County District Court granting respondents’ motions for summary judgment. The ruling dismissed appellant’s complaint in intervention by which appellant sought reimbursement via indemnification and/or subrogation for basic economic loss benefits paid pursuant to the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. On February 11, 1976, plaintiff Daniel Lan-genberger was a passenger in an automobile owned by defendant Eugene Austin and operated by defendant Vickie M. Dahl’s decedent,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hayward v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Flor v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Pfeffer v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flanery v. Total Tree, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Dennison v. VietchDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
  3. Starry v. Central Dakota Printing, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ayers v. KalalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API