Flor v. Buck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Chief Justice.
Defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Plaintiff prosecuted this action to recover $550 as damages to his automobile, alleged to have resulted from an automobile collision. Defendant among other things pleaded that plaintiff was not the real party in interest. The jury awarded plaintiff $500.
Plaintiff in substance testified that his damages were $625 to $650. On cross-examination he was asked if he had not estimated and stated to certain parties the'amount of his damages. An objection that this was incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McGuigan v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Wyker v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Solberg v. Minneapolis Willys-Knight Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Borsheim v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3Cited by19 opinions
- Westendorf Ex Rel. Westendorf v. StassonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Krause v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- National Union Fire Insurance Company v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Blair v. EspelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ArltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.