Legal Opinion

Brown v. Long

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Morgan Law and Equity Court. Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Wert. Assumpsit by J. T. Brown against S. T. Long and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Transferred from the Court of Appeals under the act creating said court.

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, J.(1) On November 25, 1912, one Davis, who was then a day laborer in the service of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, made a written assignment of his then earned wages, and those to be earned in the future, to Long & Abel. The consideration stated for the assignment was “value received.” The assignment of unearned wages, outside of the excepted enumeration made in section 2 of the act approved April 11, 1911 (Acts 1911, p. 370), was ineffectual and void under the provisions of that act. —Speilberger v. Brandes, 3 Ala. App. 590, 58 South. 75. On February 5, 1913, Long &…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Town of Fort DepositSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Logan v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. Town of Cottonwood v. H. M. Austin & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Speilberger Bros. v. BrandesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Bank of Mobile v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Stephens v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API