Legal Opinion

Lunsford v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1932No. 6 Div. 104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an action indebitatus assumpsit for' money had and received, resulting in a judgment for the defendant.

The money sought to be recovered was paid by the plaintiff to the defendant in satisfaction of ten promissory notes executed by the plaintiff to the W. E. II. Improvement Corporation on the 13th day of January, 1929, representing installments on the purchase price of “Lot 45 in Block 2, according to the plan and survey of West End Highlands,” as evidenced by writing of the same date as the notes, the total purchase price being $1,-275, $425 of which was paid in cash to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spring Co. v. KnowltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. General Electric Co. v. Town of Fort DepositSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Dodson v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  5. Town of Cottonwood v. H. M. Austin & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Herren v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Canning v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Horticultural Development Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Sauls v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API