Legal Opinion
United States v. Carpenter
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 19, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 13761PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, Chief Judge.
In this proceeding the United States of America seeks to recover meat subsidy payments based on the alleged failure of defendant to maintain appropriate records.
The matter comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss premised upon two theories:
1. The complaint does not charge defendant with violation of any substantive provision of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, its _ supplements or amendments.
2. The Reconstruction Finance Corporation did not conduct administrative proceedings with regard to defendant’s meat subsidy claims as provided by law.
Our…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Riverview Packing Co., Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Riverview Packing Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Service Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Berchem v. Reconstruction Finance CorpEmergency Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States or America v. Rex CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958