Hildock v. Grosso
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bv
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This appeal is from an order of the court below taking off a compulsory nonsuit. There is no appeal from such an order and therefore the appeal must be quashed: Dellacasse v. Floyd, 332 Pa. 218, 2 A. (2d) 860.
The quashing of the appeal means that the case may be retried. If the testimony on a second trial should be the same as on the one we are reviewing, such retrial would be a useless proceeding. The nonsuit was removed because of a mistaken view of the law by a majority of the court below; Judge Case, who dissented, had the right view.
Defendant owned the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moon v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Dellacasse v. Floyd Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Piquet Et Ux. v. WazelleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Crouse v. LubinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Warman v. CraigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Loch v. ConfairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Breslin by Breslin v. RidarelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Mazi v. McANLISSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Hagans v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- American Automobile Ins. v. Penn Mutual Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.