Legal Opinion

Rooks v. Woods, Housing Expediter

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 18, 1951No. 13350PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

Brought as Feinberg’s case 1 was, under Sec. 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 2 the suit was for restitution of rent overcharges on apartments in Miami, Florida, and for treble damages.

The defense raised, by motion to dismiss for failure to negative it, and affirmatively in their answer, was that under the provisions of Sec. l.(b) (6) 3 of the governing rent regulation, the apartments were exempted from rent control.

The motion to dismiss was denied, and the cause was fully tried on the tendered issue, whether the apartments were, within the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  2. City of Orange v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  3. Barnes v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  4. Feinberg v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Shell Pipe Line Corp. v. VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API