Legal Opinion

Miller v. Brown-Fikes Ford, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 9, 1979No. Civ. 1749PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this contract case Miller, the defendant below, raises three issues on appeal: (1) whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the judgment or whether it is contrary to the evidence; (2) whether the oral contract for the purchase of a skidder is enforceable; and (3) whether the oral contract should be enforced because of Code of Alabama 1975, § 5-19-16 dealing with unconscionable contracts.

The judgment reveals Miller was ordered to pay Brown-Fikes Ford, Inc., the plaintiff below (hereinafter Brown-Fikes), the sum of $1,651.89 together with costs.

Brown-Fikes filed a complaint consisting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. William J. Wineberg v. Raymond P. ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. Daniel v. MatthewsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  4. Dial v. GravesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Williams v. ClarkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Briggs v. WoodfinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Jackson v. WallerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Hughes v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Williams v. CottrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API