Daniel v. Matthews

WRIGHT, Judge.

Suit was filed by plaintiff Ross E. Daniel, d/b/a Daniel Logging Company, against defendants Matthews and Bedsole. The damages were claimed for property loss proximately resulting from- the negli*570gent and wanton conduct of defendants. From a judgment for the defendants entered by the court sitting without a jury, plaintiff appeals.

The only error assigned is that the court erred in rendering the decree (sic) of April 14, 1970. The legal effect of such an assignment is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment or that the judgment is contrary to the evidence. We…