Legal Opinion · Dissent

Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, Superintendent

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1997No. 95-99003Published

1Dissent

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge,

with whom Judges GOODWIN, BRUNETTI, T.G. NELSON and HAWKINS join, dissenting.

I

If you listen closely, perhaps you too can hear what the majority hears: the sounds of silence. Congress said nothing about section 2254(d)’s temporal scope anywhere in Chapter 153 of Title I of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 1996 U.S.C.C.A.N. (110 Stat.) 1214. Under Landgraf v. USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 280, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 1505, 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994), we must therefore inquire whether section 2254(d) has a retroactive effect; if it does…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API