Legal Opinion

Biagi v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 15, 1953No. Nos. 29101, 29451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Biagi seeks to recover damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq., for injuries suffered in an automobile collision, defendant being liable for the acts of a non-commissioned driver of the car allegedly responsible for the accident.

The United States challenges the jurisdiction of the Court under the Tort Claims Act. It asserts that plaintiff has already recovered under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act and is therefore barred from bringing the present action, 5 U.S.C.A. § 751 et seq., being plaintiff’s exclusive remedy.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sweet v. KoloskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Walker v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API