Felkner v. Dooly
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County. — Ho». G. W. Morse, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCARTY, J.
A rehearing was granted in this ease, and its reconsideration confined solely, to the question as to whether defendant’s plea, in his answer, of the statute of limitations, is a bar to (the action.
After again carefully reviewing the record, the. exhaustive and able brief filed by respondent for a rehearing, and the authorities therein cited, we are satisfied that the result reached in our former decision in this case (Felkner v. Dooly, 27 Utah 350, 75 Pac. 854) must be modified. While we adhere to the doctrines announced in that opinion, we are satisfied that the facts do not bring the entire…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Riddle v. WhitehillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Ganser v. GanserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Hamilton v. DoolyUtah Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kimball v. McCornickUtah Supreme Court · 1927
- Wasden v. ColtharpUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Boydstun v. JacobsNevada Supreme Court · 1915
- Levy v. RylandNevada Supreme Court · 1910