Legal Opinion

Grier v. Grier

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1940No. Appeal, 66PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The parties to this action were married on June 29, 1932. They separated February 4, 1934 when the respondent left the libellant and their common abode. The master recommended a divorce on the ground of desertion. Exceptions to the master’s report were overruled and a decree was entered on that ground.

Since respondent left the libellant, a clear case of wilful and malicious desertion is made out (Van Dyke v. Van Dyke, 135 Pa. 459, 19 A. 1061) unless respondent is justified in the desertion by libellant’s conduct toward her and only such conduct will justify a desertion as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rinoldo v. RinoldoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Van Dyke v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Rosa v. RosaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Winner v. WinnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Scholz v. ScholzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knapp v. KnappSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Hyder v. HyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Presser v. Presser, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API