Legal Opinion
State v. Grant-Chase
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 3, 1995No. 93-268PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The defendant, Cindy Grant-Chase, was convicted of first degree assault, RSA 631:1 (Supp. 1993), after a jury trial in Superior Court (Fauver, J.). On appeal, the defendant argues that the Trial Court {Smith, J.) erred in its pretrial order by refusing to suppress statements she made in response to police questioning, in violation of her right to counsel under the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution and part I, article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution.
In an opinion dated December 14, 1994, we affirmed the defendant’s conviction. The defendant moved for reconsideration. See…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Minnick v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. Zeta Chi FraternitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. WeeksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Grant-Chase v. Commissioner, NHCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- State v. RoacheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.