Jade Trading, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT’S INVOCATION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND REJECTING PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM OF “AT ISSUE” WAIVER OF PRIVILEGES
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action under Section 6226 of the Internal Revenue Code ehalleng-*488ing the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) adjustment of their tax liability and assessment of penalties for 1999. In the Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment (FPAA) at issue, the IRS disallowed capital losses approximating $40,000,000 and assessed penalties of some $4,000,000, on the Ervin brothers, the real parties in interest.1
Defendant contends…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Deseret Management Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Alpha I, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Jade Trading, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.