Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Portland Const. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 18, 1934No. 316PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff is a surety company which on April 26, 1923', executed a bond to the defendant, the Village of Bennington, Vermont, to secure the performance by the defendant, Portland Construction Company, of a contract to lay a pavement and sower in a street of the village. The condition of the bond among other things was as follows: That the contractor “shall in all respects comply with the terms of the contract * * ■' and in a manner satisfactory to the Village of Bennington complete the work contracted for, and shall save harmless the Village of Bennington from any…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Equitable Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Getchell & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Peterson & SampsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Clarence L. Boyd Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Minidoka County Ex Rel. Detweiler Bros. v. KriegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Wilmington Housing Authority v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1946
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Minidoka County Ex Rel. Detweiler Bros. v. KriegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965