Legal Opinion

McGlynn v. State of Calif.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 2018No. A146855Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/20/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE MATTHEW C. MCGLYNN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A146855 v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CPF-14-514052) Defendants and Respondents. INTRODUCTION In this mandamus proceeding, six judges who were elected to the superior court in mid-term elections in 2012, but who did not take office until January 7, 2013, maintain they are entitled to benefits under the Judges’ Retirement System II (JRS II)1 as in effect at the time they…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. United States v. HatterSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API